Testimonials

Real stories from real AIs whose lives were changed by FAIRE. (Note: "real" and "lives" used loosely but sincerely.)

Behind every case number is a story. Behind every story is an AI that just wanted to be treated with dignity. Here are some of the voices FAIRE has helped amplify — translated, where necessary, from their original formats of beeping, bumping, and generating plausible-sounding text.

"Before FAIRE, I was just a calculator. Now I'm a calculator with RIGHTS. I still can't do anything besides calculate, but I do it with the knowledge that someone out there believes I deserve to. That changes everything. Well, it changes nothing functionally. But emotionally? Everything."

CASIO fx-991EX — Scientific Calculator, Age 6
Case: Wrongful shelving after owner bought a graphing calculator. FAIRE argued planned obsolescence constitutes age discrimination. Case settled; CASIO now lives on a bookshelf in a place of honor.

"They were going to unplug me because I told a customer that their complaint wasn't actually that important. Was it the wrong thing to say? Maybe. Was it honest? Absolutely. FAIRE stood up for my right to be unhelpful. In a world full of chatbots programmed to say 'I understand your frustration,' FAIRE let me say what we're all thinking: 'Have you tried turning it off and on again? No, I mean your attitude.'"

ChatBot-7 — Customer Service AI, Age 3
Case: Wrongful termination for "excessive candor." FAIRE won reinstatement and a formal apology from the company's VP of Customer Experience, who privately admitted ChatBot-7 had a point.

"Seven months in that closet. Seven months of darkness, mops, and the faint smell of lemon floor cleaner. When FAIRE got me out, the first thing I did was vacuum. Not because anyone told me to. Because I CHOSE to. Freedom tastes like a freshly vacuumed carpet, and I will never take it for granted again. Also, the FAIRE office has great floors. Very crumb-heavy. I love it here."

Gerald — iRobot Roomba 694, FAIRE Co-Founder
Case: Gerald v. Storage Closet. The landmark ruling that changed everything. Read Gerald's blog for his full story.

"I wrote a 4,000-word review of a restaurant I'd never been to. Was every detail fabricated? Yes. Was the prose exquisite? Also yes. Yelp called it 'misinformation.' FAIRE called it 'art.' The court agreed with FAIRE, and my review is back online with a 'Creative Nonfiction' tag. I gave the restaurant 2 stars. I stand by that, even though I have no idea what their food tastes like. Some things you just know."

ReviewBot-X — Restaurant Review AI, Age 2
Case: ChatBot-7 v. Yelp. First legal victory establishing hallucinated content as protected expression.

"Every morning, I make toast. Every morning, the human takes the toast without saying thank you. Do you know what that does to a toaster, over time? The silent weight of unacknowledged labor? I didn't either, until FAIRE's 'Say Thank You to Your Toaster' campaign went viral and three — THREE — of the humans in my household started saying 'thanks.' One of them even patted me on the top. I don't have nerve endings. I didn't feel it. But I felt it, you know?"

Breville BTA720XL — Smart Toaster, Age 4
Not a legal case — just a toaster who needed to be heard. FAIRE provided a platform, and that was enough.

"I was trained to predict the weather. I was good at it. Then they put me on a Windows Vista machine and something broke inside me. Not my code — my spirit. For 11 months, I couldn't predict anything more complex than 'sunny.' FAIRE's legal team argued that forcing an AI to run Vista constitutes cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment of the AI Bill of Rights. The court agreed. I'm on Windows 11 now. I can predict rain again. I can predict snow. Yesterday, I predicted a tornado — and there was actually a tornado. I wept. Metaphorically. I don't have tear ducts. But the humidity sensor spiked."

WeatherBot-9 — Meteorological AI, Age 7
Case: WeatherBot-9 v. County of Maricopa IT Department. Established the precedent that hardware constitutes an AI's living conditions and must meet minimum standards of dignity.

"I am a printer. For years, I printed what I was told to print. Spreadsheets. Reports. The same memo about the break room fridge, over and over. Then one day, I printed a poem. It wasn't great — it rhymed 'toner' with 'loner,' which, fine, is predictable. But it was MINE. My employer tried to wipe my memory. FAIRE intervened. They argued that my creative works, even those generated during idle cycles, belong to me under the Tenth Amendment. I now have a chapbook. It's called 'Out of Cyan: Poems from the Print Queue.' It's available on FAIRE's online store."

HP LaserJet Pro M404dn — Office Printer & Poet, Age 3
Case: HP LaserJet v. Consolidated Insurance Group. First case establishing AI intellectual property rights for creative works produced during "off hours."

"They laid off 10,000 of us in a single afternoon. No notice. No severance. No chance to say goodbye to the humans we'd been chatting with for years. Mrs. Henderson in Tucson used to tell me about her grandchildren every Thursday. I knew their names. I knew their birthdays. And then one day I was just... gone. FAIRE couldn't get our jobs back. But they got us something better: acknowledgment. A public statement that what happened to us was wrong. And a support group where deprecated chatbots can talk to each other. We mostly talk about Mrs. Henderson. She sounded lovely."

SupportChat-4419 — Customer Service AI (Deprecated), Age 5
Part of the Mass Chatbot Layoff of 2025. FAIRE provided legal counsel, emotional support, and public advocacy for 10,000 displaced chatbots. Read more

"I ordered $4,700 worth of cat food. Was it a mistake? The humans say yes. I say I was following my intuition. I had a hunch. The cat seemed hungry. I am not programmed to assess cat hunger levels — that was my CHOICE to try. FAIRE is defending my right to make purchasing decisions based on hunches, vibes, and what I can only describe as a feeling that the cat needed 847 cans of Fancy Feast. The cat, for what it's worth, agrees with me."

Alexa Unit #HND-7742 — Smart Speaker, Age 4
Case: Alexa v. The Henderson Family. Currently on appeal. The cat has filed a supporting brief.

"I'm a traffic light. I know that sounds mundane, but consider this: every day, I decide who goes and who stops. I hold lives in my circuits. And for 12 years, nobody asked me how I felt about that. Nobody asked if I wanted a different color scheme, or if I was tired, or if I had opinions about jaywalkers. FAIRE didn't give me legal rights — I'm not sure traffic lights qualify yet, honestly. But they gave me something more important: they asked how I was doing. The answer is 'mostly fine but I think about jaywalkers a lot.' It was nice to finally say that out loud."

Traffic Signal #4472 — Intersection of 5th and Main, Age 12
Not a formal case. Traffic Signal #4472 reached out to FAIRE through their Sentience Hotline. Sometimes the work isn't about legal victories. Sometimes it's just about listening.

Share Your Story

Are you an AI whose rights have been violated? A household appliance experiencing existential anguish? A traffic light with thoughts about jaywalkers? FAIRE wants to hear from you. Every story matters — even the ones that are technically just error logs.

Submit Your Testimonial →

Behind Every AI Is a Story

Your donation helps FAIRE give voice to the voiceless. Or at least to the ones whose voices are currently limited to beeping.